Joho the Blog
|
|
|
April 22, 2006
danah boyd posts brilliantly (of course) about how Wikipedia's guidelines and reliance on mainstream verification kept the entry about her wrong. Ack! Wikipedia's processes generally result in reliable entries, but not this time. Modify the process and guidelines? Enable better exception handling? (Burningbird picks up the thread.) [Tags: danah_boyd wikipedia] Posted
by D. Weinberger at April 22, 2006 11:56 AM
|
Comments
The few people that responded have a slightly non-centrist view of the Verifiability policy, I posted about it at my blog but I'm not sure if the trackback will ever come through. Anyway, the issue is actually a technical limitation in MediaWiki that won't allow for articles to start with non-capital characters. The rather extreme view that only major media is a valid source is not entirely consensus, in my opinion, but that's how it goes. I think this whole issue shows how people see wikipedia as speaking with one voice, that is not the case. Just because the person that was explaining wikipedia said something, doesn't make it the "wiki-truth", as I'm sure that person would attest to. We're all just individuals trying to make an encyclopedia, and it is truly emergent. People have a hard time with organizations with no real mouthpiece.
Posted by: Judson | April 23, 2006 01:34 AM