<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joho the Blog &#187; aughties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/tag/aughties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Naming the decade that&#8217;s going</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/12/30/naming-the-decade-thats-going/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/12/30/naming-the-decade-thats-going/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aughties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=8957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let the record show that during the early 1990s, I was pushing for calling the coming decade The Aughties. According to an amusing piece by Rebecca Mead in The New Yorker, that&#8217;s one of the leading contenders, although the article explains that it&#8217;s actually corruption of the word. I didn&#8217;t know! Forgive me! So, I [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the record show that during the early 1990s, I was pushing for calling the coming decade The Aughties. According to an <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2010/01/04/100104taco_talk_mead">amusing piece by Rebecca Mead in The New Yorker</a>, that&#8217;s one of the leading contenders, although the article explains that it&#8217;s actually corruption of the word. I didn&#8217;t know! Forgive me!</p>
<p>So, I still don&#8217;t know what we should call these past ten years. The Aughties? The Oh-Ohs? The Balloon Years? The Netcade? Millenium 3.0? </p>
<p>And, yes, you do detect a bit of desperation in my tone. That&#8217;s because unless we find a name that actually works, I&#8217;m going to continue in my head to think of these as The Bush Years oh lord oh no. You don&#8217;t want a decade whose name requires you to take the Lord&#8217;s name in vain immediately after saying it.</p>
<p>Anyway, here&#8217;s hoping our Twenty-Teens are better than this decade has been!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/12/30/naming-the-decade-thats-going/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.339 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 15:34:41 -->