<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joho the Blog &#187; commerce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/tag/commerce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No category of digital content has attracted payments from more than 33% of American Net users</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/30/no-category-of-digital-content-has-attracted-payments-from-more-than-33-of-american-net-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/30/no-category-of-digital-content-has-attracted-payments-from-more-than-33-of-american-net-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pew]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pew Internet reports that 65% of American Net users (75% of the people they contacted) have paid for online, digital content. Ever. And there&#8217;s no category of goods in which more than one third of the respondents have ever paid for content. The content could include articles, music, software, or anything else in digital form. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pew Internet <a href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Paying-for-Content/Overview.aspx">reports</a> that 65% of American Net users (75% of the people they contacted) have paid for online, digital content. Ever. And there&#8217;s no category of goods in which more than one third of the respondents have ever paid for content.</p>
<p>The content could include articles, music, software, or anything else in digital form. Here are the results for the fifteen different types of content Pew asked about:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>33% of internet users have paid for digital music online </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>33% have paid for software</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>21% have paid for apps for their cell phones or tablet computers</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>19% have paid for digital games</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>18% have paid for digital newspaper, magazine, or journal articles or reports</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>16% have paid for videos, movies, or TV shows</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>15% have paid for ringtones</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>12% have paid for digital photos</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>11% have paid for members-only premium content from a website that has other free material on it</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>10% have paid for e-books</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>7% have paid for podcasts</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>5% have paid for tools or materials to use in video or computer games</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>5% have paid for &#8220;cheats or codes&#8221; to help them in video games</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>5% have paid to access particular websites such as online dating sites or services</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>2% have paid for adult content</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>The first three are way lower than I would have expected. That 15% have paid for ringtones I find bewildering and just a little depressing. That 2% report having paid for &#8220;adult content&#8221; I take as meaning 2% actually responded, &#8220;Yeah, I pay for porn. You gotta problem with that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Overall, there are a number of different conclusions we could draw: </p>
<p>1. The survey was flawed. (The survey questions are <a href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Paying-for-Content/~/media/8F5F5A64A2914CFB917E5E9060383390.pdf">here</a> [pdf]). But Pew is a reputable group, and not in service of some other group with an agenda. </p>
<p>2. There is such a wealth of goodness on the Net that in no single category do a majority of people have to use money to get what they want. </p>
<p>3. This a sign of disease: So few people are paying for anything that entire categories of goods-provisioning are going to die, taking the abundances with them. </p>
<p>4. This is a sign of health: New business models based on minority participation are and will emerge that will keep the categories alive, and, indeed, flourishing.</p>
<p> 5. Most of what&#8217;s available on the Net sucks so much that we won&#8217;t pay for it. </p>
<p>6. We are just so over paying for things, dude.</p>
<p>FWIW, I find I&#8217;m willing to pay for more content these days, in part out of a sense of responsibility, in part because the payment mechanisms have gotten easier, and always if I can sense the human behind the transaction. (This is a self-report, not a principled stand.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/30/no-category-of-digital-content-has-attracted-payments-from-more-than-33-of-american-net-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.320 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 12:58:43 -->