<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joho the Blog &#187; defamation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/tag/defamation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Linking to defamation is not defamation</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/10/28/linking-to-defamation-is-not-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/10/28/linking-to-defamation-is-not-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everythingIsMiscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/10/28/linking-to-defamation-is-not-defamation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Canadian court has decided that linking to a defamatory page is not itself an act of defamation. It does leave admit exceptions, such as repeating the content of the defamatory passage or linking the phrase &#8220;The truth about Wayne Crookes is found here.&#8221; The chilling effect if the court had decided otherwise would have [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Canadian court has <a href="http://www.p2pnet.net/stuff/crookes%20vwikimedia.pdf">decided</a> that linking to a defamatory page is not itself an act of defamation. It does leave admit exceptions, such as repeating the content of the defamatory passage or linking the phrase &#8220;The truth about Wayne Crookes is found here.&#8221; </p>
<p>The chilling effect if the court had decided otherwise would have been positively arctic.</p>
<p><span><span id="tagspan" class="tags">[Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/berkman" rel="tag"></a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/law" rel="tag">law</a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/canada" rel="tag">canada</a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/hyperlinks" rel="tag">hyperlinks</a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/defamation" rel="tag">defamation</a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/wayne+crookes" rel="tag">wayne_crookes</a> ]</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/10/28/linking-to-defamation-is-not-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.319 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 18:50:40 -->