<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joho the Blog &#187; googlewhack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/tag/googlewhack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s whacking of GoogleWhack is whack</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/01/28/googles-whacking-of-googlewhack-is-whack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/01/28/googles-whacking-of-googlewhack-is-whack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cluetrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlewhack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Googlewhacking is the harmless pastime of trying to find two word combinations that get a single return when searched for at Google (without quotes around them). Gary Stock invented it in 2002, and it took off rather rapidly. [Disclosure: I was an early promoter of it (also here and here and here, etc.). Now, nine [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.googlewhack.com/">Googlewhacking</a> is the harmless pastime of trying to find two word combinations that get a single return when searched for at Google (without quotes around them). Gary Stock invented it in 2002, and it <a href="http://www.unblinking.com/heh/googlewhack.htm">took off</a> rather rapidly. [Disclosure: I was an <a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/backissues/joho-feb11-02.html">early promoter</a> of it (also <a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/archive/2002_01_01_archive.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/backissues/joho-dec20-02.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/archive/2002_01_01_archive.html#8540056">here</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;q=site:hyperorg.com+googlewhack#q=site:hyperorg.com+googlewhack&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X&#038;tbo=1&#038;prmd=ivns&#038;tbas=0&#038;fp=7e91ac07de17c45c">etc</a>.).</p>
<p>Now, nine years and millions of views later, Google has decided that Googlewhack threatens its brand. Gary <a href="http://blog.nexcerpt.com/2011/01/28/adsense_nonsense/">reproduces</a> the irksome, frustrating, poorly-written, and poorly-thought objection from Google's AdSense Purity Squad. It's the sort of inanity caused one hopes by a bot. On the other hand, why would we entrust our culture to bots?</p>
<p>Jeez, Google! How about working towards the day when Google + Jerk is a Googlewhack!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr width=100>
<p>[Jan. 29, 2011:] <a href="http://blog.nexcerpt.com/2011/01/29/adsense_sentience/">Gary reports</a> that he got a personal note apologizing for the initial demanding message, and that all is well. Well done, Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/01/28/googles-whacking-of-googlewhack-is-whack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.340 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 12:52:48 -->