<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joho the Blog &#187; harold feld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/tag/harold-feld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Harold Feld&#8217;s explanation of an FCC issue you probably are paying no attention to but that is likely to determine the fate of telecommunications in the US</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2012/03/22/harold-felds-explanation-of-an-fcc-issue-you-probably-are-paying-no-attention-but-that-is-likely-to-determine-the-fate-of-telecommunications-in-ths-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2012/03/22/harold-felds-explanation-of-an-fcc-issue-you-probably-are-paying-no-attention-but-that-is-likely-to-determine-the-fate-of-telecommunications-in-ths-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harold feld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=11725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In fact, Harold&#8217;s post is so long that I&#8217;m only half way through it, but I have to leave for a plane. In it he explains in some detail the history and ramifications of&#8230; well, here&#8217;s a taste from near the beginning: &#8230;Verizon graciously offered to buy out Cox&#8217;s AWS spectrum so that Cox could [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, <a href="http://tales-of-the-sausage-factory.wetmachine.com/my-insanely-long-field-guide-to-the-verizonspectrumcocox-deal/">Harold&#8217;s post</a> is so long that I&#8217;m only half way through it, but I have to leave for a plane. In it he explains in some detail the history and ramifications of&#8230; well, here&#8217;s a taste from near the beginning:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;Verizon graciously offered to buy out Cox&#8217;s AWS spectrum so that Cox could get out of the wireless business. And, in what can only be an amazing coincidence for utterly independent agreements that should in no way make anyone think that the major cable players are colluding with their Telco/Wireless chief rival, Verizon and Spectrumco offered to let Cox in on the same three agreements to become exclusive resllers and become a member of the &#8220;Joint Operating Entity&#8221; (JOE) to develop all these cool new technologies.<br />
So you see, it&#8217;s all totally innocent, and does not in the least look like a cartel agreeing not to compete, dividing up markets, and setting up a Joint Operating Entity so they can continue to meet and discuss their business plans on an ongoing basis while developing a patent portfolio to use against competitors like DISH and T-Mobile&#8230; </p></blockquote>
<p>Harold Feld works for <a href="http://www.PublicKnowledge.org">Public Knowledge</a>, which works for an open Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2012/03/22/harold-felds-explanation-of-an-fcc-issue-you-probably-are-paying-no-attention-but-that-is-likely-to-determine-the-fate-of-telecommunications-in-ths-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harold Feld on why Comcast wants to win, but win just enough</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/01/12/harold-feld-on-why-comcast-wants-to-win-but-win-just-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/01/12/harold-feld-on-why-comcast-wants-to-win-but-win-just-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harold feld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/01/12/harold-feld-on-why-comcast-wants-to-win-but-win-just-enough/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harold Feld presents a coherent, incisive perspective on why Comcast is afraid of winning too big in its court case that argues the FCC does not have the jurisdiction to enforce Net Neutrality rules. This question is especially important since Comcast looks like it is indeed going to win its case. Plus Harold has a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wetmachine.com/item/1820">Harold Feld presents a coherent, incisive perspective</a> on why Comcast is afraid of winning too big in its court case that argues the FCC does not have the jurisdiction to enforce Net Neutrality rules. This question is especially important since Comcast looks like it is indeed going to win its case. </p>
<p>Plus Harold has a most excellent Buffy reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/01/12/harold-feld-on-why-comcast-wants-to-win-but-win-just-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.316 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 09:49:17 -->