<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joho the Blog &#187; miscellaneous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/tag/miscellaneous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Banish the miscellaneous?</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/03/26/banish-the-miscellaneous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/03/26/banish-the-miscellaneous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[everythingIsMiscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everything is miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oprah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=9262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When both Oprah and Lifehacker, two of the most respected names in Life Advice, both recommend not labeling things &#8220;miscellaneous,&#8221; a lonely-yet-proud voice must speak up. (I mean me, by the way.) First, telling us to &#8220;banish&#8221; the miscellaneous is silly. We have miscellaneous drawers and bins because classification schemes are imperfect. Go ahead and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When both <a href="http://www.oprah.com/home/The-10-Habits-of-Highly-Organized-People_1">Oprah</a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5500906/banish-the-miscellaneous-category-when-youre-organizing">Lifehacker</a>, two of the most respected names in Life Advice, both recommend not labeling things &#8220;miscellaneous,&#8221; a lonely-yet-proud voice must speak up. (I mean me, by the way.)</p>
<p>First, telling us to &#8220;banish&#8221; the miscellaneous is silly. We have miscellaneous drawers and bins because classification schemes are imperfect. Go ahead and try to follow Oprah&#8217;s and Lifehacker&#8217;s advice on your kitchen&#8217;s miscellaneous drawer. You&#8217;ll either have to create so many ridiculous sub-divisions that you won&#8217;t remember them, or you&#8217;ll have to force objects into categories so thinly related that you can&#8217;t remember where you put them. That&#8217;s why you have a miscellaneous drawer in the first place.</p>
<p>Second, their complaint is about the use of the the miscellaneous category for physical objects. In the digital world, giving objects multiple categorizations and allowing multiple classification schemes â€” what I mean by the miscellaneous in <a href="http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com">that book</a> I wrote a couple of years ago â€” makes more sense than trying to come up with a single, perfect, fits-all-needs, univocal classification system.</p>
<p>Viva la miscellaneous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/03/26/banish-the-miscellaneous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A guy I didn&#8217;t like</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/05/03/a-guy-i-didnt-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/05/03/a-guy-i-didnt-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 15:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=6788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I met a guy who I disliked after only a few minutes of conversation. That&#8217;s unusual for me. I wanted to get out of his presence, which is also unusual. Weirdest of all, couldn&#8217;t figure out why I didn&#8217;t like him. There was nothing wrong with him. If you asked me, I wouldn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I met a guy who I disliked after only a few minutes of conversation. That&#8217;s unusual for me. I wanted to get out of his presence, which is also unusual. Weirdest of all, couldn&#8217;t figure out why I didn&#8217;t like him. There was nothing wrong with him. If you asked me, I wouldn&#8217;t be able to come up with a single explanatory factor.</p>
<p>Only after I&#8217;d politely exempted myself from his presence did I realize why I didn&#8217;t like him: For whatever psychological reason,  I found myself becoming competitive, trying to impress him. In his presence, I was an a-hole. </p>
<p>It was me, not him. And it makes me wonder how often the people I don&#8217;t like I don&#8217;t like because I don&#8217;t like who I am with them.</p>
<p><span><span id="tagspan" class="tags">[Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/berkman" rel="tag"></a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/miscellaneous" rel="tag">miscellaneous</a> ]</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/05/03/a-guy-i-didnt-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.330 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 14:59:40 -->