<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joho the Blog &#187; peter suber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/tag/peter-suber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lobby for FaceBook, Yahoo, NewsCorp and Elsevier opposes the White House Open Access order, among others</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2013/05/17/lobby-for-facebook-yahoo-newscorp-and-elsevier-oppose-the-white-house-open-access-order-among-others/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2013/05/17/lobby-for-facebook-yahoo-newscorp-and-elsevier-oppose-the-white-house-open-access-order-among-others/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter suber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=12850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Suber points out that FaceBook, Yahoo, Elsevier and Yahoo have joined the NetChoice.org lobby that has issued a clarion call against open access that blurs the line between lies and gibberish. Peter blows the statements apart, leaving nothing but clean air and a whiff of ozone. NetChoice.org is publicizing its monthly &#8220;iAWFUL&#8221; (Internet advocates [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://plus.google.com/109377556796183035206/posts?cfem=1">Peter Suber points out</a> that FaceBook, Yahoo, Elsevier and Yahoo have joined the <a href="http://NetChoice.org">NetChoice.org lobby</a> that has issued a clarion call against open access that blurs the line between lies and gibberish. Peter blows the statements apart, leaving nothing but clean air and a whiff of ozone. </p>
<p> NetChoice.org is publicizing its monthly &#8220;iAWFUL&#8221; (Internet advocates watchlist for ugly laws) list of policies that it doesn&#8217;t like. The list has little to do with advocating for the Internet, and everything to do with <a href="http://www.netchoice.org/about/">supporting the interests of Internet businesses</a> (&#8220;committed to tearing down barriers to e-commerce&#8221;). For example, this month&#8217;s iAWFUL list includes <a href="http://www.netchoice.org/2013-may-iawful/5-data-breach-notification-bills/">data breach notification bills</a> and a <a href="http://www.netchoice.org/2013-may-iawful/7-imposing-state-price-controls-on-e-books/">CT bill</a> that &#8220;would force publishers to sell digital books at &#8216;reasonable&#8221; prices to state libraries.&#8221; That&#8217;s in addition to opposing actions (including the recent epochal <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf">White House Memorandum</a>) that support public access to research &mdash; often research that the public has paid for. But they have it all  bollixed up.  </p>
<p> What makes it more distressing, then, is that reputable journals, including <a href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/462099/netchoice_california_privacy_bills_bad_internet/">Computerworld</a>, <a href="http://www.cio.com/article/733531/NetChoice_California_privacy_bills_are_bad_for_Internet?taxonomyId=1375">CIO</a> and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2038902/netchoice-california-privacy-bills-are-bad-for-internet.html#tk.rss_all">PC World</a>, are running NetChoice&#8217;s iAWFUL PR puffery. </p>
<p> Thankfully,  Peter Suber is on the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2013/05/17/lobby-for-facebook-yahoo-newscorp-and-elsevier-oppose-the-white-house-open-access-order-among-others/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[2b2k] Why Is Open-Internet Champion Darrell Issa Supporting an Attack on Open Science?</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2012/01/08/2b2k-why-is-open-internet-champion-darrell-issa-supporting-an-attack-on-open-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2012/01/08/2b2k-why-is-open-internet-champion-darrell-issa-supporting-an-attack-on-open-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[too big to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2b2k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danah boyd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter suber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=11410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve swiped the title of this post from Rebecca J. Rosen&#8217;s excellent post at The Atlantic. Darrell Issa has been generally good on open Internet issues, so why is he supporting a bill that would forbid the government from requiring researchers to openly post the results of their research? [Later that day: I revised the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve swiped the title of this post from <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/01/why-is-open-internet-champion-darrell-issa-supporting-an-attack-on-open-science/250929/">Rebecca J. Rosen&#8217;s excellent post </a>at The Atlantic. Darrell Issa has been generally  good on open Internet issues, so why is he supporting a bill that would forbid the government from requiring researchers to openly post the results of their research? [Later that day: I revised the previous sentence, which was gibberish. Sorry.]</p>
<p>Rebecca cites danah boyd&#8217;s awesome post: <a href="http://socialmediacollective.org/2011/12/11/scholarly-publishing/">Save Scholarly Ideas, Not the Publishing Industry (a rant)</a>. <a href="http://infodocket.com/2012/01/05/peter-suber-on-new-bill-to-block-open-access-to-publicly-funded-research/">InfoDocket has a helpful roundup</a>, including to <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/109377556796183035206/posts/QYAH1jSJG6L">Peter Suber&#8217;s Google+ discussion</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2012/01/08/2b2k-why-is-open-internet-champion-darrell-issa-supporting-an-attack-on-open-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacKenzie Smith on open licenses for metadata</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/06/08/mackenzie-smith-on-open-licenses-for-metadata/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/06/08/mackenzie-smith-on-open-licenses-for-metadata/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lod-lam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lodlam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[museums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter suber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MacKenzie Smith of MIT and Creative Commons talks about the new 4-star rating system for open licenses for metadata from cultural institutions: The draft is up on the LOD-LAM site. Here are some comments on the system from open access guru Peter Suber.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacKenzie Smith of MIT and Creative Commons talks about the new 4-star rating system for open licenses for metadata from cultural institutions:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/swQYX4oqfB4?hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/swQYX4oqfB4?hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>The <a href="http://tinyurl.com/4starlicense2">draft is up on the LOD-LAM site</a>.</p>
<p>Here are some <a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/06/06/peter-suber-on-the-4-star-openness-rating/">comments</a> on the system from open access guru <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/hometoc.htm">Peter Suber</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/06/08/mackenzie-smith-on-open-licenses-for-metadata/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Access and libraries</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/06/03/open-access-and-libraries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/06/03/open-access-and-libraries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter suber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve posted the next in my series of library podcasts at the Library Innovation Lab blog. This one is with Peter Suber, the hub of the Open Access movement.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted the next in my series of library <a href="http://librarylab.law.harvard.edu/blog/2011/06/02/library-labthe-podcast-002-free-knowledge/">podcasts</a> at the <a href="http://librarylab.law.harvard.edu/blog">Library Innovation Lab blog</a>. This one is with <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/%7Epeters/hometoc.htm">Peter Suber</a>, the hub of the Open Access movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/06/03/open-access-and-libraries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.330 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 04:52:59 -->