<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joho the Blog &#187; social_objects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/tag/social_objects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Initial reaction to Google Wave: Maybe transformative</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/05/28/initial-reaction-to-google-wave-maybe-transformative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/05/28/initial-reaction-to-google-wave-maybe-transformative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everythingIsMiscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google_wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social_networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social_objects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/05/28/initial-reaction-to-google-wave-maybe-transformative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m excited about Google Wave, based on TechCrunch&#8217;s description of it, and my own fervid projections of what I&#8217;d like it to be. If I&#8217;m understanding it correctly â€” and the likelihood is that I&#8217;m not &#8230; take that as a serious warning â€” this could be bigger than Facebook and MySpace in terms of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m excited about <a href="http://wave.google.com/">Google Wave</a>, based on <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/28/google-wave-drips-with-ambition-can-it-fulfill-googles-grand-web-vision/">TechCrunch&#8217;s description of it</a>, and my own fervid projections of what I&#8217;d like it to be. If I&#8217;m understanding it correctly â€” and the likelihood is that I&#8217;m not &#8230; take that as a serious warning â€” this could be bigger than Facebook and MySpace in terms of how it terraforms the Net.</p>
<p>Social networking sites were hugely important because they addressed a huge lack. The Web knows how pages are linked, but it knows nothing about the relationships among groups of people.  SNS&#8217;s added that layer. And the smartest of the social network sites treated themselves as platforms on which other apps could be built.  Google Wave goes back to the Internet&#8217;s most basic layer: people talking with one another. While there are obviously lots of apps and protocols enabling the back and forth gesticulating we call &#8220;conversation,&#8221; there&#8217;s been nothing underneath them all that recognizes that they&#8217;re all different ways of doing the same basic thing: IM doesn&#8217;t know about email doesn&#8217;t know about Usenet doesn&#8217;t know about chat doesn&#8217;t know about Facebook messaging doesn&#8217;t know about Twitter. Each of these ways humans have invented to talk with one another is treated as its own separate app, as different as playing a zombie-killing game and marking up x-rays. In fact, many years ago, a few of us tried to generate interest in what we called <a href="http://www.threadsml.org">threadsML</a>, which we hoped (vainly) would be a standard way for conversations to be shared, stored, and moved around. </p>
<p>Wave, as I understand it, is a platform underneath the multiple modalities of human conversation. It doesn&#8217;t care if you&#8217;re emailing, IMing, or throwing photos at one another. The structural object is the conversation; the means of conversation is just a detail. [Note:<em> I think.</em>] The fact that you said &#8220;No way!&#8221; using IM when talking in realtime with a friend who&#8217;s reading the same email thread with you no longer will mean your expostulation will have to be treated as a separate app, just as when talking in the real world, we don&#8217;t count our hand gestures as something apart from the conversation just because we make them with our hands instead of with our mouths. </p>
<p>So far, Google is (unsurprisingly) doing the right and smart thing, opening it up to developers early on, <a href="http://xml.sys-con.com/node/980553">using</a> the open  <a href="http://xmpp.org/">XMPP</a> protocol, and open sourcing the <a href="http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/">Google Wave Federation Protocol</a>.  If this is to be more than just another app for talking, Google has to treat it like an open platform. The first sign of lock-in will scare away the very folks Google needs if Wave is to be more than just a shiny new set of tin cans and string for those who want to talk with other Google users. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s lots that could go wrong. And my understanding of Wave is so preliminary that I&#8217;m sorry to be so far out on the limb. But I&#8217;ve been waiting on this limb for a long time, frustrated that conversations are splintered by medium when they should be joined by topic and social group. Wave is the first thing I&#8217;ve seen that offers a genuine hope for getting this right by starting with the most fundamental social object we have:  people talking with one another.</p>
<p>I think.</p>
<p><span id="tagspan" class='tags'>[Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/berkman" rel="tag"></a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/google wave" rel="tag">google_wave</a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/conversation" rel="tag">conversation</a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/social networks" rel="tag">social_networks</a> <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/social objects" rel="tag">social_objects</a> ]</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/05/28/initial-reaction-to-google-wave-maybe-transformative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.338 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 17:17:21 -->