logo

Let’s just see what happens

Newsletter

Videos

Speaker

Hard to Read? Choose a style: Style 1 Style 2 Style 3 Default Toggle Sidebars

Ads I didn’t get past the first independent clause of

Posted on January 29th, 2008

From Computer Gaming World:

Engineered for professional Counter-Strike gamers…


Say, Razer Piranha, care to define your market any more narrowly?


(Yes, I know I’m being totally unreasonable and that the ad’s point is that if it’s good enough for the pro’s, it’s good enough for you. I just enjoy the nano-marketing feel of the thing.) [Tags: advertising marketing unfair_reactions ]

Categories: marketing

Previous: « The Google generation is illiterate || Next: Course begins »

2 Responses to “Ads I didn’t get past the first independent clause of”

  1. AKMA, on January 29th, 2008 at 10:47 am Said:

    Isn’t that a dependent clause?

  2.  

  3. davidw, on January 29th, 2008 at 6:38 pm Said:

    You’re probably right. It’s been a long time since I was taught the difference. But isn’t there an implied subject or something like that?

    Oh, so lost in the mists of time :(

  4.  

Leave a Reply

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered by WordPress