Joho the Blog » Pronouns were a mistake that we can fix

Pronouns were a mistake that we can fix

I think half the questions I ask a certain set of people are of the sort “Wait, which ‘he’?” or “Sheila or Marg?” All pronouns do is introduce ambiguity, error, and irked moods. We’d be better off without them, by which I mean without pronouns.

Worse, in some languages pronouns force us to make decisions about the gender of inanimate objects and even of abstractions. How does that help? Why don’t we also pretend that every object has a race, an eye color, and a favorite fruit? Assigning everything hit points would actually make more sense.

There are two arguments in favor of pronouns. First, some people’s names are long. Might I suggest that if we got rid of pronouns, people would soon start taking shorter names? Or we’d come up with a convention to shorten the names in unambiguous ways. Perhaps “y” would be appended to the first syllable, as in “First Lady Michy said to President Oby, “Bary, I think you ought to meet with ex-Governor Schwarzy,” all without any implied disrespect.

Second, plural pronouns can be useful when the group doesn’t have a known name or an obvious common descriptor. For example, “Two men, a woman, and a cockerspaniel drove up to an off-duty waiter and a former action movie star, and said ‘Hey, why don’t you get in our car?,” which they did.” The ‘they’ in that sentence does some useful work. I will allow it.

First person plural is an interesting challenge. I think I would allow “we” only for an indefinite group, as in the title of this post. Otherwise, instead use the name or descriptor of the group you have in mind. Think about how clarifying it would be to actually have to specify who you’re pretending to speak for?

I will allow the use of the first person singular since it is less ambiguous than using your own name: “Give that to David” isn’t helpful when I’m in a room with David Winer, David Cameron, and Michelangelo’s Statue of David. Second person singular pronouns should not be allowed, however, since there can be ambiguity about whom one is addressing. Second person plural I will allow on the same grounds as third person plural. Plus, by disallowing the second person singular, I have solved the ambiguity caused by using the exact same frigging word for second person singular and plural. What were we thinking?

Y’all are welcome.

5 Responses to “Pronouns were a mistake that we can fix”

  1. Vielen Dank an Sie

  2. Let’s look at “Y’all are welcome.”

    Most people use “your welcome”, but shouldn’t it really be “You’re welcomed” or “you’re welcome?” Such as “You’re welcomed to try my new bicycle if you’d like.” Or if someone thanks you, you would say “you’re welcome.”

  3. […] Pronouns were a mistake that we can fix […]

  4. Actually, grammatical gender is an advantage. Consider the English sentence (due to Quine): “He took the manuscript from the briefcase and threw it into the sea.” What went into the sea, the manuscript or the briefcase? You can’t tell.

    In French, these words happen to differ in gender, so the pronoun neatly disambiguates the sentence “Il retira le manuscrit de la serviette et le jeta dans le mer” has “le jeta”, meaning that the manuscript (masc.) went in the drink, whereas “Il retira le manuscrit de la serviette et la jeta dans le mer” has “la jeta”, meaning that it’s the briefcase (fem.) that got drowned.

  5. Alloy: has the following offer: take 40% off your entire order and get free shipping when you
    use promo code 40CYBER. SOLE SOCIETY – Get 20
    percent off your first purchase of $69. From December 1 to December 3, take 80% off of original retail prices.

Leave a Reply


Web Joho only

Comments (RSS).  RSS icon

Switch to our mobile site