Joho the Blog » [2b2k] The Despair of Knowledge

[2b2k] The Despair of Knowledge

Jill Lepore has an excellent take-down in The New Yorker of Clay Christensen’s The Innovator’s Dilemma. Yet I am unconvinced.

I thought I was convinced when I read it. It’s a brilliantly done piece, examining Christensen’s evidence, questioning his methods, and drawing appropriate lessons, including wondering why we accepted the Innovator’s Dilemma for decades without critically examining it. (Christensen became so famous for it that his last name isn’t even flagged as a spelling error on my Mac.)

I got de-convinced by a discussion on a mailing list I’m on that points to some weaknesses in Lepore’s own argument, including her use of “cherry-picked” examples — a criticism she levels at Christensen — and her assumption that the continuity of companies, as opposed to their return on assets, is the right measure. As a person on the mailing list points out, John Hagel, John Seely Brown and Lang Davison take return on assets as a key metric in their book The Big Shift. And then someone else maintained that ROA is a poor measure of networked phenomena. That morphed into a discussion about the pragmatic value of truth: Does disruption provide a helpful framing for the New York Times as it considers its future?

The problem is that brains are truthy. They are designed to pay attention to things that seem to matter to us, bending our world around our concerns and interests. And brains are associative, so they make sense of the world — maybe even at the level of perception — by finding the relationships that seem to matter to us. In Heidegger’s terms, we are not indifferent knowing machines, but are creatures that care about what happens to us and to others. The brain is an unreliable narrator.

We now have access to an unfathomable sea of information that can contradict anything we settle on. That sea has been assembled by caring creatures and their minions, but it is so vast and global that it contains information beyond the caring and linking of any one of us. Every understanding can be subverted with a wink and a hand wave because all understanding simplifies a world that is resolutely and even necessarily complex. The universe outruns us.

Now we have machines that can look at masses of data and escape from our temptation to turn everything into a narrative. But those machines are limited by our decision about which data is worth gathering and connecting. There is hope in this direction, but it’s not clear whether we are capable of accepting the findings of machines that correlate without stories.

TL;DR: Our brains are truthy and the world is too big to make sense of. Not that that will stop us from trying.

 


[June 20:] Clay Christensen has cried foul in an interview.

5 Responses to “[2b2k] The Despair of Knowledge”

  1. […] David Weinberger’s blog post, “[2b2k] The Despair of Knowledge”About David | […]

  2. This is beautifully expressed. So, if brains are “truthy,” and the sea is infinite, or at least un-fully-knowable, there’s still the question of the extent to which the structures, matrices, instruments of the brain are open to insightful discovery. To what extent, that is, that we can better understand the ways in which our urge to truth breed error.

  3. […] of them would like. Their Harvard colleagues are weighing in – see David Weinberger’s reaction. And Silicon Valley (at least the ValleyWag types) is going after Prof. Christensen (The Guy Who […]

  4. roman shades custom size

  5. I am curious to find out what blog system you’re utilizing?
    I’m having some minor security problems
    with my latest blog and I would like to find something more secure.

    Do you have any solutions?

    Great composing assignments additionally regularly take shape by intuition aggressive.
    What this means isn’t to continue on and into all forms of
    detail about certain areas which are not necessary for the reader.
    Great (https://Waynedefrancesco.Zendesk.Com/) 1800 flowers free shipping By knowing who your audience is, you’ll have a
    newsletter that speaks directly for a readers. It is additionally advisable
    that to not bring in preconceived notions since the whole purpose will be lost under such circumstances.

Leave a Reply


Web Joho only

Comments (RSS).  RSS icon