As a result of lurking in a mailing list’s conversation about whether and how to translate Heidegger’s use of the ancient Greek term φυσις, I did some poking around at Google.

φυσις does not translate easily, which is why Heidegger scholars like to use the original Greek. (Meanwhile, I can’t even find an html character for the upsilon with a diacritical, and the raw Greek character failed in the preview of this post in Chrome.) It’s usually translated as “nature,” but that’s the result of a 2,500-year-old-game of “Telephone.” For Heidegger, it has something to do with what shows itself as having its own way of becoming or emerging. Richard Polt aand Gregory Fried in A Companion to Heidegger’s Introduction to Metaphysics take a stab at it by referring to it as the “emerging-abiding sway.” Anyway, that’s not the point of this post.

Here are the results. Have fun making sense of them. They are wonky in ways that indicate that I don’t know how to do Google queries.

Semi-interesting factoids based upon faulty research and poor quantitative reasoning skils:

• Hardly anyone who uses the Greek bothers to point out that there are two ways to transliterate it.

• A fifth of all mentions of the Greek term also mention Heidegger.

• If a work mentions Heidegger and the Greek term, it’s three times more likely to transliterate it as physis.

Fun minigame: How many of those did I mess up?

---

Google’s search syntax documentation is not great, and the results sometimes seem wonky. Here’s some documentation:

• Google’s documentation
• Beyond’s helpful documentation
• MIT’s documentation of delimiters not mentioned on that page.

Categories: philosophy dw