So, the tech industry and the US military have come to a compromise that opens up more spectrum for wireless communications while preserving the slice the military uses for some of its delicate radar. Here’s what I don’t understand: If the military equipment is so sensitive to “interference” that it requires no other device broadcast at that frequency, why isn’t it incredibly vulnerable? Isn’t this really a strong argument for moving to an Open Spectrum policy?

Over at GreaterDemocracy.org, Jock Gill blogs on why inteference is a dangerously misleading metaphor.

Categories: Uncategorized dw