Joho the Blog » [Vanguard] Explicit Metdata: Bad!
EverydayChaos
Everyday Chaos
Too Big to Know
Too Big to Know
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary edition
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Small Pieces cover
Small Pieces Loosely Joined
Cluetrain cover
Cluetrain Manifesto
My face
Speaker info
Who am I? (Blog Disclosure Form) Copy this link as RSS address Atom Feed

[Vanguard] Explicit Metdata: Bad!

Bobby Kishore of Microsoft is explaining how to create a KM system without relying on explicit metadata. People don’t like filling out forms and entering metadata explicitly. So, a KM system ought to mine content for metadata.

That’s certainly right. But here’s a related question: Why don’t people enter metadata? It’s not simply because it’s a pain in the butt: individual pain for organizational benefit. It’s also because filling in metadata makes us pull back from the world, an attitude that goes against our biology. In fact, it’s desire itself that draws us into the world and makes us shudder as we draw back from it.


David Reed comments that the way people describe how they share information isn’t how they share information. Huge implications for how you build a KM system.

Previous: « || Next: »

2 Responses to “[Vanguard] Explicit Metdata: Bad!”

  1. Good News On Metadata – Content is Just a Lighthouse

    David Weinberger has been blogging on the TTI Vanguard conference (OK I’m envious) and it looks like there are some voices being raised about the silliness of expecting people to behave like machines so machines can understand people. Three clips.

  2. Filling in metadata

    Earl Mardle comments on David Weinberger’s blogging of the “TTI Vanguard conference” (I can’t see where it’s called that on the linked page, looks like “Knowledge Management Comes of Age” to me). Sez Weinberger: Bobby Kishore of Microsoft is explaining

Leave a Reply

Comments (RSS).  RSS icon