Joho the Blog » Reading the Globe: Webcasts, questions and ambiguities
EverydayChaos
Everyday Chaos
Too Big to Know
Too Big to Know
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary edition
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Small Pieces cover
Small Pieces Loosely Joined
Cluetrain cover
Cluetrain Manifesto
My face
Speaker info
Who am I? (Blog Disclosure Form) Copy this link as RSS address Atom Feed

Reading the Globe: Webcasts, questions and ambiguities

An interesting front-page story by Jonathan Saltzman in today’s Boston Globe talks about the fact that an ailing justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has been listening to oral arguments over the Web. The article spends most of its time discussing whether it’s necessary for a judge to hear oral arguments and in only one paragraph wonders if hearing arguments over a webcast might affect the case or the judge’s decision. That is, there’s no discussion of the medium’s effect on the message, yet another sign that the medium is becoming invisible, as all successful media must.


A page 2 story thinks it so unusual that Bush took questions from the audience that it merits a subhead: “Takes questions at an Ohio event.” Our president actually deigned to speak spontaneously, albeit undoubtedly after hours of rehearsal. The article doesn’t mention how many questions he took or how long the Q&A session was.

I’m puzzled, though, by one transition in the article, by Tom Raum of the AP:

The White House made no attempt to screen the audience or the questions, spokesman Scott McClellan said.

However, much of the downtown near the hotel where Bush spoke was barricaded off. About 100 antiwar protestors chanted…

What’s the “However” supposed to tell us? What’s the implied contrast?


My wife, son and I had an amusing five minute conversation in which we talked past each other because we took the following teaser and text radically differently:

[Teaser] There Goes Arroyo: Red Sox send rocking righthander to Reds for slugging outfielder Pena.

[Text] Yesterday, the Red Sox opted to …deal Bronson Arroyo to the Cincinnati Reds for slugging outfielder Wily Mo Pena…

My wife and I couldn’t figure out why they would trade a player as a penalty for hitting another player. Our son understood that “slugging outfielder Pena” means Pena is a slugger, not that he was slugged.

Ah, language! Ah, sports know-nothings! [Tags: ]


WRT to the length of the Q&A period, Tim Grieve at Salon has the mot juste:

At the end of his speech in Cleveland today, George W. Bush said he’d be “glad to answer some questions.” But when the questions at the lunchtime event dragged on a little long for his liking, Bush blurted out, “Anybody work here in this town?”

Think Progress beat us to the inevitable punch line: Not as many as used to, sir.

Since Bush became president, the unemployment rate in Cleveland has increased by 29 percent, from 4.5 percent in January 2001 to 5.8 percent in January 2006.

Previous: « || Next: »

Leave a Reply

Comments (RSS).  RSS icon