Joho the Blog » Was Shakespeare anti-lawyer
EverydayChaos
Everyday Chaos
Too Big to Know
Too Big to Know
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary edition
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Small Pieces cover
Small Pieces Loosely Joined
Cluetrain cover
Cluetrain Manifesto
My face
Speaker info
Who am I? (Blog Disclosure Form) Copy this link as RSS address Atom Feed

Was Shakespeare anti-lawyer

Bill Koslosky blogs about the attempt to take Shakespeare’s “First kill all the lawyers” (approx) line as actually being pro-lawyer, drawing on a Seth Finkelstein post.

I agree with Bill and Seth that it is hard indeed to take that line as anything but anti-lawyer. I’d only make two points:

First, one line of argument by the Shakespeare-didn’t-write-Shakespeare folks says that the author of the Works must have been a lawyer because of all the legal language and metaphors, especially in the sonnets.

Second, clearly Shakespeare was thinking in the back of his mind, “But not the Berkman Center.” [Tags: shakespeare lawyers berkman ]

Previous: « || Next: »

Leave a Reply

Comments (RSS).  RSS icon